Liquidity & Technical
Liquidity & Technical
Auto1 trades €11.1M per day on a €5.0B market cap — workable for specialist mid-cap funds but capacity-constrained for any large institutional book. The tape sits in a textbook tactical-bullish / structural-bearish split: a fresh death cross on 17 Feb 2026 marked the start of a sub-200d regime, then price ripped +43% in three months off the panic low. Whether the bounce sticks above €24 or fails into the €18 shelf decides the next 3–6 months.
1. Portfolio implementation verdict
5d capacity, 20% ADV (€M)
Largest position cleared in 5d (% mcap)
Fund AUM supported, 5% pos (€M)
ADV 20d / Mcap
Technical scorecard (−6 to +6)
Capacity-constrained, tactically constructive. Specialist funds under €500M of AUM can build a 2% position over multiple weeks; €1B+ funds will become the market. The tape is rebuilding off February's washout but has not yet repaired the 200-day downtrend — momentum positive, structure negative, both within €2 of the verdict line.
2. Price snapshot
Price (€)
YTD return
1-year return
52-week position
3-month return
Down on the year, down on the prior twelve months, but up 43% in three months — the price strip captures the regime change perfectly: a stock recovering from a violent re-rating, not yet reclaimed. Beta versus a developed-market benchmark is not reliably estimable because the rebase file contains no benchmark series for this German listing.
3. Price with 50-day and 200-day SMA — full history since IPO
Most recent death cross on 17 February 2026 confirms a structural downtrend. The April 2024 golden cross at €4 (after the all-time low of €3.30) launched the +700% multi-year recovery; the February 2026 break inverts that regime.
Price is 4.6% below the 200-day SMA (€22.80 vs €23.90). This is a downtrend regime tactically reclaiming the 50-day. The long-history view tells the truer story: AG1 IPO'd at €53 in Feb 2021, lost 94% over three years to a €3.30 low in February 2024, then ran +900% to €31 by late 2025 before re-rating −47% in the Feb 2026 break. The current bounce is mean-reversion off an extreme — it has not yet repaired the November–February damage.
4. Relative performance — no benchmark series staged
A like-for-like German or European consumer-discretionary benchmark series was not staged for this run. Treat the chart as an absolute total-return rebase: AG1 is up +180% versus three years ago, but down −27% from the early-November 2025 peak.
The shape matters more than the absent benchmark. AG1 went from 100 → 377 in 28 months (a six-bagger from the post-pandemic carnage), then surrendered roughly half the gain in a single Feb 2026 dislocation, then bounced. A peer or benchmark line would show whether the re-rating is company-specific or sector-wide; the cleanly idiosyncratic February drop suggests company-specific (likely guidance- or print-driven). Cross-reference the Catalysts tab before sizing.
5. Momentum panel — RSI(14) and MACD histogram
RSI sits at 64, MACD histogram at +0.06 and decelerating from the +0.61 April peak. Read together: the bounce off the February panic (RSI bottomed at 21 on 13 Feb 2026) has carried into mid-range RSI territory, but momentum is rolling — the histogram has compressed seven sessions in a row from +0.28 to +0.06. Near-term call is constructive but tiring: the rally that delivered +43% in three months is asking for the next catalyst to push RSI above 70, not extend the move by inertia.
6. Volume, volatility, and sponsorship
Realized vol has collapsed from 88% in March 2026 to 54% — back at the 5-year median (p50 = 53.5%). Translation: the Feb 2026 panic has been worked off, but this stock is not a low-vol vehicle even when calm — its calm baseline is twice that of an index name. The 25 Feb 2026 session — €15.87 close, −18.2% on 6.8× average volume — was the watershed event. Recent rally sessions show volume running above the 50-day average through April and May 2026, which is constructive: this is sponsored buying, not a drift higher on thin air.
7. Institutional liquidity panel
The technical-data manifest flags this name as "Illiquid / specialist only" based on a strict mid/large-cap institutional sizing test. The reality is more nuanced: €11.1M of daily turnover on a €5.0B market cap supports specialist mid-cap funds up to roughly €300–600M of AUM at conventional position weights. Above that scale, position-building becomes the trade.
A. ADV and turnover
ADV 20d (shares)
ADV 20d value (€M)
ADV 60d (shares)
ADV / Mcap
Annual turnover
B. Fund capacity at conventional position weights
A fund of €607M can establish a 2% position in five trading days at the aggressive 20%-ADV participation; at the conservative 10%-ADV pace that same fund halves to €303M. A 5% position caps the supported fund at €243M (aggressive) or €121M (conservative). Above those ceilings, you are the price — and post-trade markouts will reflect it.
C. Liquidation runway for issuer-sized positions
D. Intraday range proxy
Median daily true range over the last 60 sessions is 1.97% — close to the 2% threshold where order-book impact starts to bite for size. Slippage on block executions should be modeled, not assumed away.
The 5-day clearance bar: the largest position that clears in five trading days at 20% ADV is ≈ 0.24% of market cap (€12M); at the conservative 10% ADV it halves to ≈ 0.12% (€6M). Anything beyond 1% of market cap requires three weeks of patient execution at 20% ADV, or twice that at 10%.
8. Technical scorecard and stance
Stance: tactically constructive, structurally cautious — net +2 over a 3-to-6 month horizon. The setup since the February panic — RSI reset from 21, recovery on rising volume, SMA50 reclaimed — leaves the SMA200 at €23.90 as the next test level. The trade triggers are clean:
- Bullish confirmation: a daily close above €24.50 — reclaims the 200-day SMA and the breakdown level from the Feb gap; unlocks a path toward the €28–29 supply zone (Nov 2025 distribution shelf).
- Bearish invalidation: a daily close below €18.00 — breaks the SMA50 (€19.14) and the lower Bollinger Band; reopens the Feb low (€14.63) and re-establishes the death-cross downtrend.
Liquidity is the constraint for institutional sizing, not for the trade itself. For specialist mid-cap funds under €500M of AUM, this is implementable. For larger funds, the correct action is watchlist with a slow-build mandate — average in over 4–6 weeks at 10% ADV participation, sized to no more than 1% of book to keep exit runway under three weeks.